View Full Version : Do you want reduce servers?
SaDRuLeS
03-21-2007, 11:27 AM
As we know games in GBNA are slow, in my opinion IJJI should reduce servers 8 to 4 because servers 3, 4 always have maximum 40 people, and 5, 6 have max. 5 persons =/ i think with less servers can be make less time for wait a game.
MrN1cky
03-21-2007, 11:58 AM
totally agree
server 1 and 2 are chick > battle axe
server 3 and 4 are normal axe > dragon
and maybe a server 5 for all people (if i have a friend whos is starting gb its impossible to play with him)
G3orG3
03-21-2007, 12:50 PM
Good Point SaD. Maybe the server will be more stable, causing less Lag :D
FinalFantasy
03-21-2007, 12:52 PM
seemingly no point in having a server that no one goes on. Reducing the servers would just look nice though...it wouldn't have any lasting impact, if that's what you were looking for
xAvP2MasTeRx
03-21-2007, 12:54 PM
yeah probably the server wont lag as much, because there will be less of them.. and yeah i like the idea about the 5th server, incase the person starts playing, but their chicken, and probably the person who will show them the game will be higher ranked.
Closer
03-21-2007, 02:26 PM
They should limit the servers until business picks back up.
lnspire
03-21-2007, 02:46 PM
I would say 6 atleast, so there can be a step up inbetween the beginner and free zones.
SaDRuLeS
03-21-2007, 03:33 PM
I think IJJI could make for low level gain more gps for winning games, for example from chicken to battle axe, gps by win 1 vs 1 = 8 gps with power user 9, it can be a good way for their can catch up high ranks, i think more people could enjoy Gunbound
SaDRuLeS
03-21-2007, 03:36 PM
totally agree
server 1 and 2 are chick > battle axe
server 3 and 4 are normal axe > dragon
and maybe a server 5 for all people (if i have a friend whos is starting gb its impossible to play with him)
I agree with you nice idea
Spartan
03-21-2007, 04:57 PM
i think we should get rid of some of those Avatar ON zones that no one uses
Sudden Death
03-21-2007, 07:23 PM
I think IJJI could make for low level gain more gps for winning games, for example from chicken to battle axe, gps by win 1 vs 1 = 8 gps with power user 9, it can be a good way for their can catch up high ranks, i think more people could enjoy Gunbound
Good idea it can be easier for us rank up fast
nub_pwner
03-21-2007, 07:24 PM
couldnt be too bad but as more people join the servers should go +
BabyGotSkill-Momo
03-21-2007, 07:24 PM
I want an avatar on server like back in GBWC when there was a specific server for avatar on users. Like they would get 15% more GP&Gold. :<
And a separate server just for events. ._.
Deadlightbulb
03-21-2007, 07:25 PM
4 - No.
6 would be perfect. Battle Axes vs Dragons??
Thats no fair. =P
Hola_Ke_Tal
03-25-2007, 12:45 AM
i vote yes, reduce them! :afro:
James
03-25-2007, 12:57 AM
i think that there should be:
noob ava off,pro ava off,avatar on all ranks
Cruzader
03-25-2007, 01:02 AM
When I played the Brazilian service, there were only 5 servers, and they had plenty of activity (Most of the times there were 4 digits rooms) in all of them. There are 8 servers on GBNA and the most active one rarely has more than 400 rooms. Maybe removing a few ones would work.
Skills2323
03-25-2007, 02:20 AM
haha yeha nce idea nicky i like that
eLem3nT
03-25-2007, 04:16 AM
They need to get rid of the Professinal Zones, no one ever goes in them
Mario
04-03-2007, 04:28 PM
As we know games in GBNA are slow, in my opinion IJJI should reduce servers 8 to 4 because servers 3, 4 always have maximum 40 people, and 5, 6 have max. 5 persons =/ i think with less servers can be make less time for wait a game.
zone 5, and 6 have max? I hardly see anybody in that server. There is like 2 ppl in server 5 everytime and sometimes theres none. Most people are in servers 1 and 2 cause they are mostly beginners.
Sunshine
04-03-2007, 04:31 PM
I think more servers give more options to ranks and avatar, it can be good either way, it wouldnt bother me if there was 4.
Blaze
04-03-2007, 04:42 PM
maybe to 5 or 6 but not 4 pro zones have no1 in em
0Cloud0
04-03-2007, 06:44 PM
The 5 free for all level zone is a good idea but will be rampant with botter I imagine. There should be some sort of compromise with it, but still a overall good idea. Less is more.
HIimEVANS
04-03-2007, 06:53 PM
When I played the Brazilian service, there were only 5 servers, and they had plenty of activity (Most of the times there were 4 digits rooms) in all of them. There are 8 servers on GBNA and the most active one rarely has more than 400 rooms. Maybe removing a few ones would work.
400 rooms is more than enough, most room have nobody in them.
They need to get rid of the Professinal Zones, no one ever goes in them
I wouldnt mind keeping 8. Just find an idea to get them more active.
MrExploiter
04-03-2007, 07:54 PM
Interesting point, I think if they drop the servers they should direct the server space to diffrent parts thus stabalizing the lag isssues.
XxMrEdgarxX
05-12-2008, 02:00 AM
yes, more people in servers.
Tungchu92
05-12-2008, 05:31 AM
first get rid of locked rooms lol now im annoyed by them -.-
then we'll talk about reducing servers (which i agree)
Suffocake
05-12-2008, 07:58 AM
Maybe instead of server being avi on or off.
When you make a room there should be an option
that makes avatar count or not.
Do you get what I mean?
Lawl
ThangLIa
05-12-2008, 02:09 PM
i thought we only have 6 servers
I agree with Suffocake. Dont separate the servers. Leave it to the room master to decide. Then we will have more people in each server. I mean, servers 4 and 6 are pretty much worthless, hardly anyone uses them.
Id also like to see fully customizable games, then you can use a search feature to find a game that suits you the best.